HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SUPPORT WLF

Case Detail


Grisham v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
On February 15, 2007, the California Supreme Court ruled that tort claims filed against cigarette companies generally are time-barred when based on allegations that many years ago the companies wrongfully addicted the plaintiffs to tobacco. At the same time, the court held that a personal injury claim filed in conjunction with a wrongful addiction claim is not time-barred simply because the latter claim is barred; rather, the court ruled, personal injury claims accrue only after the plaintiff knew or should have known that she had contracted a smoking-related disease -- not when she first knew that she was addicted. The decision was a partial victory for WLF, which filed a brief in the case, urging dismissal of wrongful addiction claims. WLF argued that such claims by long-time smokers are barred by the statute of limitations because the plaintiffs knew (or should have known) for decades that they were addicted to cigarettes, yet they waited until 2002 to file suit.
Case Status:
Partial victory.
More Information and Downloads:
3/9/2006: Download the Brief
Press Release: Court Urged to Bar Untimely Claims Based on Addiction to Tobacco
Litigation Update: Court Limits Untimely Claims Based on Addiction to Tobacco
  • Welcome to the Washington Legal Foundation
  • 2009 Massachusetts Ave., NW
    Washington, DC 20036
  • info@wlf.org  |  ph. 202-588-0302
    ©2017 WLF All Rights Reserved