Washington Legal Foundation
Effective Advocate of Free Enterprise Contact Us Support the WLF WLF At-A-Glance

July 06, 2008
PublishingLitigatingCommunicating
 
WLF Resources

wlf.org has received
more than
30,000,000 hits.

Search the Site

Enter a keyword:

Legal PR.

WLF — the Leader in Free Enterprise Advocacy


Many of the downloadable files on this site require Adobe Acrobat Reader. Click the link below to download.

Washington Legal Foundation
2009 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20036

Contact Information:
info@wlf.org
ph. 202-588-0302

©2008 WLF.
All rights reserved.

Click here to visit the Supporting Our Mission page

Welcome to the WLF Web Site

WLF's CRIMINALIZATION OF FREE ENTERPRISE -
BUSINESS CIVIL LIBERTIES PROGRAM

There continues to be a growing and dangerous trend by federal and state authorities to violate business civil liberties and criminalize honest business activities when more appropriate administrative and civil remedies are available. WLF aggressively fights for economic rights and commercial free speech, and vigorously opposes wrongful criminal prosecution of free enterprise.

WLF activities target government enforcement practices by the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Sentencing Commission, State Attorneys General, and state and federal regulatory agencies.

Click here to go to WLF's Criminalization of Free Enterprise - Business Civil Liberties Program.

Support the WLF

 LATEST LITIGATION:
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker
On June 25, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a federal appeals court decision that upheld a $2.5 billion punitive damages award against ExxonMobil. The Court held that the award was excessive under federal common law; it reduced the award to $500 million. The case arose in the aftermath of the 1989 Alaska oil spill caused by the grounding of the Exxon Valdez. The decision was a victory for WLF, which had filed a brief urging the Court to reduce the size of the award. The Court agreed with WLF that punitive damages awards that exceed the amount of compensatory damages are generally inappropriate in cases decided under federal law; the decision does not affect punitive damages awarded by State courts. The Court was evenly divided on – and thus did not rule on – an additional Exxon argument: federal maritime law bars any punitive damages award in cases, as here, in which there was no finding that the wrongful act was either intentional or reckless.
IMS Health Inc. v. Sorrell
On June 23, 2008, WLF filed a brief in U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont, urging it to protect First Amendment rights by striking down a Vermont law that blocks access to critical healthcare information. The law criminalizes the collection and disclosure of information about the prescribing practices of physicians. WLF argued that the Vermont law violates the First Amendment by prohibiting disclosures of truthful information, even disclosures arising outside the context of advertising. WLF argued that such prohibitions are only rarely permissible and only then when based on showings of the most compelling of government needs. The law has prevented medical data companies from collecting and distributing information about what drugs are being prescribed by Vermont doctors, even though the companies ensure that no information about individual patients is ever included in their data. Similar laws in Maine and New Hampshire have already been struck down as unconstitutional.
Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc.
On June 16, 2008, WLF filed a brief with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, urging it to reject Pennsylvania's current product liability rule that holds distributors strictly liable for injuries from products which they did not even manufacture. WLF's brief advocates the adoption of a revised rule used by most other states that would apply a negligence standard for assessing liability. WLF's brief argued that Pennsylvania should reject the strict liability standard found in the Restatement (Second) of Torts, Product Liability, Section 402A, which was originally adopted to deal with manufacturing defects, and instead adopt a negligence standard found in Restatement (Third), Section 2 of the Restatement Third, which would be fairer to distributors of products.
United States v. Ionia Management S.A.
On June 6, 2008, WLF filed a brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a major corporate criminal case, joined with and serves as counsel for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Association of Corporate Counsel, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. In its brief, WLF argued that the jury instructions improperly allowed a corporation to be held vicariously liable for a rogue employee's misconduct because such imputation of criminal liability was not authorized either by Congress or a proper reading of Supreme Court precedents. WLF further argued that no liability should be imposed where the employee acted in direct contravention of corporate policy and a robust compliance program.

 

June 19, 2008

WLF MEDIA BRIEFING
Appellate Experts to Review 2007 Supreme Court Term

The Honorable Dick Thornburgh, Of Counsel, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP

Thomas C. Goldstein, Partner, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

R. (Ted) Edward Cruz, Partner, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP.

Dan Himmelfarb, Partner, Mayer Brown LLP

 Download a PDF of the Invitation

View Webcast


May 6, 2008

WLF MEDIA BRIEFING
Biosimilars: Seeking A Pathway Balancing Timely Consumer Access & Innovation

Sandra J. P. Dennis, Deputy General Counsel for Health Care, Biotechnology Industry Organization

William B. Schultz, Partner, Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Former FDA Deputy Commissioner for Policy

Arnold I. Friede, Counsel, McDermott Will & Emery

 Download a PDF of the Invitation

 Download Speaker Biographies

View Webcast

 

 

June 13, 2008

WLF WEB SEMINAR SERIES
Losing More than Weight? How Taxes, Speech Mandates & other Anti-Obesity Policies Threaten Personal Freedom

Professor Patrick Basham, Founding Director, Democracy Institute

Dr. John C. Luik, Senior Fellow, Democracy Institute

 Download a PDF of the Invitation

 Download Speaker Biographies

View Webcast

June 3, 2008

WLF WEB SEMINAR SERIES
Oversight and Investigation: Lessons from the 110th Congress and Effective Defense Strategies for Targets

Theodore H. Bornstein, Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP

Philip G. Kiko, Member, Foley & Lardner LLP

 Download a PDF of the Invitation

 Download Speaker Biographies

View Webcast

 

 
Special Report: Federal Erosion of Business Civil Liberties
On May 1, 2008, WLF released the publication of its Special Report: Federal Erosion of Business Civil Liberties, an up-to-date analysis of the key legal, judicial, and regulatory developments over the years of the growing trend at the federal level to criminalize normal business activities. With an Introduction by former Attorney General Dick Thornburgh, WLF's report critically examines seven legal topics, including the erosion of the attorney-client privilege and the dilution of mens rea requirements. The report discusses the increasing and unwarranted criminal prosecution of businesses and individuals by the Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency for regulatory matters when administrative or civil remedies would be more appropriate. WLF also produced a useful companion Timeline fold-out chart that summarizes the key cases and events discussed in the 125-page report.

More Information:
 5/1/2008: Press Release PDF
  5/1/2008: Download Report
  5/1/2008: Download Chapter 1 - Criminal Intent
  5/1/2008: Download Chapter 2 - Environmental Enforcement
  5/1/2008: Download Chapter 3 - DOJ Policies
  5/1/2008: Download Chapter 4 - Parallel Prosecution
  5/1/2008: Download Chapter 5 - Attorney-Client
  5/1/2008: Download Chapter 6 - Deferred Prosecution
  5/1/2008: Download Chapter 7 - Sentencing Guidelines
 
 
June 27, 2008
State Antitrust Lawsuits: A Good Way To Balance Costs And Incentives For Patented Drugs?
By Alexander Okuliar,a counsel in the Washington, D.C office, and James P. Kidder, a counsel in the Los Angeles office, respectively, of the law firm O’Melveny & Myers LLP.
Legal Backgrounder, June 27, 2008, 4 pages
 Download a PDF of the Publication
 

What's New at WLF:

 PUBLICATIONS 

More...
Appeals Court Rejects Class Certification In $800 Billion Lawsuit
By Thomas M. Smith, an attorney with the Law Offices of Thomas M. Smith in in New York City.
Legal Backgrounder, June 27, 2008, 4 pages
 Download PDF of the Publication
Georgia Supreme Court Rejects Constitutional Challenge To Expert Testimony Law
By Robert S. Highsmith Jr and Lindsey G. Churchill, attorneys in the Atlanta office of the law firm Holland & Knight LLP
Legal Backgrounder, June 27, 2008, 4 pages
 Download PDF of the Publication
High Court Undermines Precedent In Expanding Private Suits Under ERISA
By Douglas E. Motzenbecker, a partner with the Newark, New Jersey law firm Podvey, Meanor, Catenacci, Hildner, Cocoziello & Chattman, P.C
Legal Backgrounder, June 27, 2008, 4 pages
 Download PDF of the Publication
FDA’s Regulatory Extensions: An Overburdened Agency Assigns Itself New Responsibilities
By Jeffrey N. Gibbs, a principal in the Washington, D.C of the law firm Hyman, Phelps, & McNamara, P.C.
Legal Backgrounder, June 13, 2008, 4 pages
 Download PDF of the Publication
A Framework For Toxic Tort Litigation
By Joe G. Hollingsworthand Katharine R. Latimer,partners with the law firm Spriggs & Hollingsworth. Foreword by Dorothy P. Watson,Vice President and General Counsel, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Monograph, June 2008, 150 pages

 Download PDF of the Publication

 IN ALL FAIRNESS 

More...
June 16, 2008
 Depriving Americans of Treatment
By Daniel J. Popeo
May 19, 2008
 America's Green Recession
By Daniel J. Popeo
April 28, 2008
 The Audacity of Lawyers
By Daniel J. Popeo

 EVENTS FEATURING WLF 

More...

July 19, 2008

VBA Summer Meeting

June 14, 2008| 4:15 – 5:45 p.m.

Government Secrecy and Public Access to Information

May 21, 2008| 3:00pm

Legal Implications for Commercial Speech and Medical Practice





Publishing  • Litigating  • Communicating
Press Releases | Public Interest Partners | Employment | WLF Mission
Contact Us | Home