WLF on Twitter

"This dynamic organization is a prominent force in both judicial and regulatory arenas, promoting economic growth and allowing free enterprise to prosper. If you share my beliefs that our country’s ability to compete in the world economy should not be hindered by excessive regulation and unreasonable court decisions, I encourage you to join WLF in defending free enterprise."

View All » NLRB v. SW General, Inc. On September 26, 2016, WLF asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reject the government’s reading of a federal law designed to prevent presidents from evading the Senate’s constitutional advice-and-consent function. In its amicus brief, WLF argued that the... More Case Detail SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC On September 19, 2016, WLF filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court, urging it to resist calls to overturn the unanimous view of the federal appeals courts that patent-infringement defendants may assert “laches” as a defense to unreasonably delayed... More Case Detail LabNet v. Department of Labor In LabNet v. DOL, WLF asked the U.S. District Court of Minnesota to decide that the Department of Labor’s new so-called Persuader Rule violates First Amendment protections against compelled speech. The Department of Labor (DOL) has read the... More Case Detail United States v. Clay On September 12, 2016, WLF encouraged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to grant Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc in the case of U.S. v. Clay. WLF’s brief asks the appeals court to vacate the panel’s opinion and to reject... More Case Detail Robinson v. Pfizer, Inc. On September 9, 2016, WLF filed a brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, encouraging it to enforce constitutional limits imposed by the Due Process Clause on the authority of state courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over... More Case Detail Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FilmOn X, LLC On September 7, 2016, WLF asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit to uphold a lower court decision that refuses to legitimize a business model based on the unauthorized, for-profit exploitation (via the Internet) of copyrighted works. WLF... More Case Detail View All » First Amendment in Flux: Supreme Court Clarification Needed on Compelled Commercial Speech By Michael A. Walsh, a Partner with Strasburger & Price, LLP in the firm’s Dallas, TX office, and Katherine McGahey, an Associate in the firm’s Frisco, TX office. More Publication Detail... Implied-Certification FCA Claims Post-Escobar: Three Appellate Court Cases May Show the Way By Christopher W. Myers, a Partner in the Denver, CO office of Dentons, and J.W. Lafferty, an Associate in the firm’s Los Angeles, CA office. More Publication Detail... Maritime Law Provides No Safe Harbor for Asbestos Plaintiffs Seeking Nonpecuniary Damages By Brian J. Schneider, a Shareholder with Moran Reeves Conn in the firm’s Richmond, VA office. More Publication Detail... Could Federal Declaratory Relief Vindicate Preemption Defense in NY Martin Act Cases? By Robert A. McTamaney, Counsel to Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP in New York City. More Publication Detail...   View All » September 27, 2016 | 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM THE U.S. SUPREME COURT: October Term 2016 Preview The Honorable Jay B. Stephens, Of Counsel, Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Moderator) Neal Katyal, Partner, Hogan Lovells Daryl L. Joseffer, Partner, King & Spalding LLP

President and CEO’s Letter Timeline: Federal Erosion of Business Civil Liberties, Third Edition. Click here to order a hard copy WLF’s 2015 Annual Report   View All » WLF Advocacy Ads:

---